Letters to the Editor for Aug. 20
Circuit breaker would be better for poorer schools than tax cap
It struck me as more than a little ironic that, just days after the state Senate approved the governor’s tax cap plan, the state announced that high school graduation rates are up. To me, that news indicates our students — and their schools — are headed in the right direction. Tax caps, no matter how well intentioned, are a gimmick and make no sense when our children are learning and graduating.
Tax caps also concern me because they would seem to hurt poorer communities most. Poor districts — those that usually serve students of color — don’t have the resources to invest in their schools and would find it difficult, if not impossible, to override the cap imposed on them by some politicians in Albany.
From what I’ve read, the circuit breaker is the way to go. I applaud lawmakers and organizations supporting that much fairer option.
Juliet C. Benaquisto
Schenectady
The writer is president of the Schenectady Federation of Teachers.
The right fight is for public campaign financing
Re Aug. 13 article, “Candidates tackle campaign finance reform”: The article highlights two Democratic state Senate candidates, B.K. Keramati and Fred Goodman, addressing the important issue of campaign finance reform. These two men engage in a debate over who is more devoted to reforming this broken system.
Goodman says that he won’t accept donations over $250. He chides Keramati for accepting a legal donation of $9,500. Goodman also implies that since Keramati has worked for years to achieve full public financing for statewide elections, his acceptance of this contribution is hypocritical. He then criticizes Keramati’s support for public financing by claiming that the state cannot afford to “spend millions on a gravy train.”
Goodman’s last statement exposes his true colors. He really doesn’t support meaningful reform. His argument against public financing follows the same deceptive logic that giant corporations and Republicans like Hugh Farley employ to protect their “gravy train.” Both Goodman and Farley should follow Keramati’s lead and tell taxpayers the truth. The flood of tax dollars awarded powerful special interests are “payback” for political contributions, and astronomically outweigh the meager cost of public financing. In fact, such reform will ultimately save taxpayers billions.
Goodman’s attack is shameful, since it’s Keramati, not Goodman, who has for years fought on behalf of taxpayers to enact campaign finance reform. No wonder the bosses support Goodman and direct the party machine to work for free on his behalf. Without public financing, or bosses’ support, Keramati, like most citizens, is just another outsider. The $9,500 contribution was from his father-in-law and indicates family support, not special interest indebtedness.
The culprit is a system that allows politicians like Sen. Farley to collect big money from special interests, while opponents struggle to raise a small fraction of that. That’s plutocracy, not democracy. The fact that such a corrupt system doesn’t upset Goodman is quite disturbing.
Albert Ormsby
Saratoga Springs
The writer is a member of the Saratoga Springs Democratic Committee.
Church should not promote sinful activities
For a long time, now, I’ve had a big question for the Catholic churches in this region. Like, for instance, Our Lady of Assumption or Mount Carmel.
Why does a big feast go on every year with a lot of gambling and drinking? Yes, of course, there’s fun things to do, like games, entertainment, rides, fried dough, good food, drinking and betting your money. But, wait, alcohol and gambling are definitely a sin in God’s eyes. I’ve been a believer and saved over 10 years now, and was always taught what the sinful things in life are.
What kind of example are we setting for those who don’t believe?
Rebecca DeSantis
Rotterdam Junction
Park arrests are great, no thanks to photographer
Re Aug. 14 article, “Video helps police make three arrests”: Thanks to the Schenectady Police Department and state police for their Central Park public lewdness arrests.
Central Park is a jewel in our city and should never be marred by activities that endanger or degrade any family’s enjoyment of the park. To anyone using the park, call in suspicious activity. To the person who made the anonymous “YouTube pervert” video mentioned in the Gazette article, I believe you are involved, and if so, you are a cretin and a coward.
John Rizzo
Schenectady
Don’t cut welfare budget, crack down on fraud
Re Aug. 17 article, “Paterson’s tax cap proposal criticized”: If the governor wants to save $1 billion by taking it out of the Medicaid and social services budget, just hire more investigators to crack down on fraud and there is your billion. You won’t have to cut anything.
Clif Tygert
Scotia
Letters Policy
The Gazette wants your opinions on public issues.
There is no strict word limit, though letters under 200 words are preferred.
All letters are subject to editing for length, style and fairness, and we will run no more
than one letter per month from the same writer.
Please include your signature, address and day phone for verification.
For information on how to send, see bottom of this page.
For more letters, visit our Web site: www.dailygazette.com
10:53 a.m. [ Suggest removal ]
In response to church promoting sinful activities... I agree that to host gambling and drinking is contradictory to the word of God. Although, it's not a sin to have a drink, drinking in excess is. The Bible also tells us not to do anything to cause another to stumble, so if an alcoholic/recovering alcoholic/compulsive gambler attends, you've just placed the temptation in front of him/her. Then the church has gained funds from people who may have spent their family's grocery money in order to feed an addiction. I agree with you Rebecca. And, if this is the Rebecca I know, I'll sign this the "A" in RAMA from Scotia. :-)
2:35 p.m. [ Suggest removal ]
In response to the circut breaker tax...
The circut breaker makes absolutely no sense, all you are doing is shifting the tax burden to someone else ( the so called rich) . What will you do when the rich revolt and move out of state taking there business and hard earn dollars with them? Who will you tax then?